zsis) - Center for Swiss and International Tax Law

Taxation of spouses in international relations - tax segregation issues

In the zsis) issue of November 2019, the authors dealt with tax law stumbling blocks in the taxation of spouses in international relationships. In this article, they have focused on the tax segregation of international spouses. On the basis of a test scheme with three questions, they show that a systematic procedure is essential for correct tax segregation and that there is still a need for action here on the part of the assessment authority and the courts.

Far more than cryptocurrencies ...

The editorial for the focus issue "Blockchain, Crypto and NFTs". In recent years, blockchain technology has caused a stir around the world. In this context, tax law has dealt with blockchain technology primarily in connection with cryptocurrencies. However, the scope of blockchain technology goes far beyond cryptocurrencies.

Taxation of NFTs in the luxury industry - a case study

Non-fungible tokens ("NFTs" for short), i.e. unique cryptographic tokens representing physical or digital value, are currently on everyone's lips - at least since the NFT "Everydays: the First 5000 Days" was auctioned by Christie's in 2021 for USD 69.3 million. Using the NFTs of the watch brand DuBois et fils, which were issued for the first time in 2021, it will be shown how companies in the luxury sector can use NFTs both to market products and to build a close customer relationship, and which tax issues have to be taken into account.

Quasi-property trading - from the elasticity of the criteria

In its ruling, which was heard in public on October 13, 2022 and served on the parties in writing on March 30, 2023, the Federal Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of a married couple residing in the Canton of Zurich. It upheld the ruling of the Administrative Court of the Canton of Zurich, according to which the taxpayers had qualified as quasi-real estate dealers by selling a rented apartment building. The Federal Supreme Court based its decision on the fact that the taxpayers, who also held other rented properties in co-ownership, had taken a high financial risk when acquiring the property, had sold the property after a short holding period (5 ½ years), had spent a great deal of time managing the property during the holding period and had acquired it with the plan of achieving the highest possible profit upon sale. In their discussion of the ruling, the authors deal with the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning and explain why the ruling leads to legal uncertainties in practice.